Page 53 - Revista Portuguesa - SPORL - Vol 50 Nº1
P. 53

CONCLUSõES
          Em  resumo, concluímos  que  o  MUST reflecte  accurately  o
          estado nutricional do doente com tumor da cabeça e do
          pescoço, com um risco global de desnutrição que se aproxima
          dos 30% (tal como demonstrado neste estudo). Ao relacionar
          os parâmetros nutricionais e o desenrolar do período pós-
          operatório foi demonstrado que o risco global de desnutrição
          prediz a ocorrência de complicações pós-operatórias.
          Os achados deste estudo podem contribuir para futuras
          estratégias cirúrgicas. Para tal, estudos adicionais serão
          necessários para investigar se é possível contrariar os efeitos
          secundários da desnutrição nas complicações pós-operatórias
          através da instituição de suporte nutricional pré-operatório.
                                                                                                                   ARTIGO ORIGINAL ORIGINAL ARTICLE
          Referências bibliográficas:
          1.Sako K, Loré JM, Kaufman S, Razack MS. Parenteral hyperalimentation in
          surgical patients with head and neck cancer: a randomized study. J Surg Oncol
          1981;16:391-402
          2.Reilly JJ. Does nutrition management benefit the head and neck cancer
          patient? Oncology 1990;4:105-115
          3.Brookes GB. Nutritional status – a prognostic indicator in head and neck
          cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985;93:69-74
          4.Todorov P, Cariuk P, Mc Devitt T, Coles B. Characterization of a cancer
          cachectic factor. Nature 1996;379:739-742
          5.Robbins KT, Favrot S, Hanna D, Cole R. Risk of wound infection in patients
          with head and neck cancer. Head Neck 1990;12:143-148
          6.Gottschlich MM, Matarese LE, Shronts EP. Nutrition support dietetics core
          curriculum, 2nd ed. American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition,
          1993
          7.Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. January-June: Statistical Bulletin,
          1983
          8.Jong de PCM, Wesdorp RIC, Volovics A, Rouflart MMJ. The value of objective
          measurements to select patients who are malnourished. Clin Nutr 1985;4:61-66
          9.Von Meyenfeldt MF, Meijerink WJHJ, Rouflart MMJ, Buil-Maassen MTHJ.
          Perioperative  nutritional support:  a randomized  clinical trial.  Clin Nutr
          1992;11:180-186
          10.Scheltinga MRM. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA): a bedside method
          for fluid measurement. Studies of the body´s electrical impedance in various
          models of health and disease. Thesis. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit, 1992
          11.Matthews TW, Lampe HB, Dragosz KD. Nutritional status in head and neck
          cancer patients. J Otolaryngol 1995;24:87-91
          12.Linn BS, Robinson DS, KKlimas NG. Effects of age and nutritional status
          on surgical outcomes in head and neck cancer. Ann Surg 1989;207:267-273
          13.THE “MUST” REPORT - Nutritional screening of adults: a multidisciplinary
          responsibility
          14.Van Bokhorst de van der Schueren M, Van Leeuwen P, Sauerwein H, Kuik
          D. Assessment of malnutrition parameters in head and neck cancer and their
          relation to postoperative complications. Head Neck 1997;19:419-425
          15.Hussain M, Kish JA, Crane L. The role of infection in the morbidity and
          mortality of patients with head and neck cancer undergoing multimodality
          treatment. Cancer 1991;67:716-721
          16.Bassett MR, Dobie RA. Patterns of nutritional deficiency in head and neck
          cancer. Otol Head Neck Surg 1983;91:119-125
          17.Westin T, Ahlbom E, Johansson E, Sandstrom B. Circulating levels of
          selenium and zinc in relation to nutritional status in patients with head and
          neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;115:1079-1082




                                                                                       VOL 50 . Nº1 . MARÇO 2012  51
   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58