Page 27 - Revista Portuguesa - SPORL - Vol 50 Nº1

parâmetros da obstrução (avaliação subjectiva, funcional e areas, nasal peak flow and patients satisfaction in septoplasty and inferior
anatómica), fornecendo informação complementar. Neste turbinectomy. Rhinology. 1994;32:145-7.
grupo de doentes, o score de sintomas revelou-se um bom 18. Ahmann M. Nasal peak flow rate records in work related nasal blockage.
método de monitorização da resposta ao tratamento da RA, Acta Otolaryngol. 1992;112:839-44.
superior ao PFNI e à RAC. O tamanho e as características 19. Morrissey MS, Alun-Jones T, Hill J. The relashionship of peak inspiratory
airflow to subjective airflow in the nose. Clin Otolaryngol. 1990;15:447-51.
clínicas da amostra poderão ter condicionado os resultados. 20. Hilberg O, Grymer LF, Pedersen OF. Spontaneous variations in congestion
of the nasal mucosa. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1995;74:516-21.
AGRADECIMENTOS 21. Kjaergaard T, Cvancarova M, Steinsvag SK. Relation of nasal air flow to
Agradece ao Serviço de Otorrinolaringologia toda a nasal cavity dimensions. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;135(6):565-70.
colaboração, nomeadamente a disponibilidade da sala do 22. Kjaergaard T, Cvancarova M, Steinsvag SK. Nasal congestion index: A
measure for nasal obstruction. Laryngoscope. 2009;119(8):1628-32.
rinómetro acústico e todo o apoio dos Técnicos no ensino da 23. Baraniuk JN. Subjective nasal fullness and objective congestion. Proc Am
execução da RAC, sem os quais não teria sido possível realizar Thorac Soc. 2011;8(1):62-9.
este estudo. 24. Roithmann R, Cole P, Chapnik J, Barreto SM, et al. Acoustic rhinometry, ARTIGO ORIGINAL ORIGINAL ARTICLE
rhinomanometry, and the sensation of nasal patency: a correlative study. J
Referências bibliográficas: Otolayngol. 1994;23:454-8.
1. Corey JP, Gungor A, Nelson R, Fredberg J, et al. A comparison of the nasal
cross-sectional áreas and volumes obtained with acoustic rhinometry and
magnetic resonance imaging. Otolaryngol Head Nech Surg. 1997;117:349-54.
2. Min YG, Jan YJ. Measurements of cross-sectional area of the nasal cavity by
acoustic rhinometry and CT scanning. Laryngoscope.1995;105:757-9.
3. Corey JP,Nalbone VP, Ng BA. Anatomic correlates of acoustic rhinometry
as measured by rigid nasal endoscopy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
1999;121:572-6.
4. Lam DJ, James KT, Weaver EM. Comparison of anatomic, physiological and
subjective measures of the nasal airway. Am J Rhinol. 2006;20(5):463-70.
5. Fairley JW, Durham LH, Ell SR. Correlation of subjective sensation of nasal
patency with nasal inspiratory peak flow rate. Clin Otolaryngol. 1993;18:19-22.
6. Gomes Dde L, Camargos PA, Ibiapina Cda C, de Andrade CR. Nasal peak
inspiratory flow and clinical score in children and adolescents with allergic
rhinitis. Rhinology. 2008 Dec;46(4):276-80.
7. Nathan RA, Eccles R, Howarth PH, Steinsvag SK, et al. Objective monitoring
of nasal patency and nasal physiology in rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol
2005;115:S442-59.
8. Bousquet J, Khaltaev N, Cruz AA, Denburg J, et al. Allergic Rhinitis and its
Impact on Asthma (ARIA) 2008 update (in collaboration with the World Health
Organization, GA(2)LEN and AllerGen). Allergy. 2008; 63(suppl 86):8-160.
9. Dreborg S, Frew A. Position Paper: allergen standardization and skin tests.
The European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. Allergy. 1993;
48(Suppl 14):49-54.
10. Linder A. Symptom scores as measures of the severity of rhinitis. Clin
Allergy. 1988; 18: 29-37.
11. Clement PA, Gordts F. Consensus report on acoustic rhinometry and
rhinomanometry. Rhinology. 2005;43:169-79.
12. Wilson AM, Sims EJ, Orr LC, Coutie WJ, et al. Effects of topical
corticosteroid and combined mediator blockade on domiciliary and laboratory
measurements of nasal function in seasonal allergic rhinitis. Ann Allergy
Asthma Immunol. 2001;87:344-9.
13. Wihl JA, Malm L. Rhinomanometry and nasal peak expiratory and
inspiratory flow rate. Ann Allergy. 1998; 61:50-5.
14. Kesavanathan J, Swift DL, Fitzgerald TK, Permutt T, et al. Evaluation of
acoustic rhinometry and posterior rhinomanometry as tools for inhalation
challenge studies. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1996;48:295-307.
15. Uzzaman A, Metcalfe D, Komarow HD. Acoustic rhinometry in the practice
of allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immnol. 2006;97:745-52.
16. Kjaergaard T, Cvancarova M, Steinsvag SK. Does nasal obstruction mean
that the nose is obstructed?Laryngoscope. 2008;118(8):1476-81.
17. Marais J, Murray JA, Marshall I, Douglas N, et al. Minimal cross-sectional

VOL 50 . Nº1 . MARÇO 2012 25