Page 66 - Revista Portuguesa - SPORL - Vol 63. Nº2
P. 66

to CWU techniques in order to not create an       as innumerous other factors may have a more
          open  cavity  which  could  significantly  affect   prominent role in that respect, such as the
          the quality of life of patients. Additionally, for   state of the ossicular chain and the different
          CWU  procedures  we  did not  feel  the  need     types of ossicular reconstructions performed.
          to perform a routine second-look surgery as       Regarding recidivism, these cases were
          the  imaging techniques available  for follow-    significantly  lower  in  the  CWD  group.  Our
          up, namely diffusion weighted magnetic            results are in line with many convincing
          resonance imaging, have proven to be both         publications which showed that a wall down
          sensitive and specific for detecting recidivism,   technique is the safest choice to prevent the
          and, therefore, are reasonable alternatives. 13,14  need for a second surgery   4,20-22 .  The most
          The decision-making process for the surgical      likely explanation for this is that relapses may
          technique was made preoperatively in some         originate from residual epidermic tissue left in
          instances including relapses (which were all      difficult access sites for a wall up approach. In
          managed  with  CWD  techniques).  However,        that regard it is interesting to note that in 42,9
          in  most  cases,  it  was  made  intraoperatively   % of our relapses there was cholesteatoma
          considering anatomic factors, extension of the    visible in the supratubal recess or sinus
          disease and surgeon expertise. In that regard,    tympani. On this detail, it is worth mentioning
          it was common for a surgery to start as a CWU     otovideoendoscopy as a breaking technology
          procedure,  and  then  be  converted  to  CWD     which has proven to  reduce the incidence
          whenever deemed necessary.                        of residual cholesteatomas by enabling
          In our series, the most frequent reasons for      identification of lesions in difficult access areas
          performing a CWD tympano-mastoidectomy            under otomicroscopy.  This technology, which
                                                                                  23
          were an extensive disease present in difficult    can be an added value, was not available in
          access areas (S1 and S2), recidivism, erosion of   our institution during the reviewed surgeries.
          the posterior external auditory canal or lateral   On the other hand, intermittent otorrhea
          semicircular canal, low volume mastoids,          affecting quality of life was more commonly
          presence of cholesteatoma in an only hearing      seen in the CWD group, probably due to the
          ear, high surgical risk and a low likelihood of   increased risk that an exposed open cavity
          adequate follow-up.                               has of becoming infected if the required
          Furthermore, in the same surgical time,           preventive measures are not followed.
          ossicular reconstruction was carried out using    Regarding follow-up, it’s important  to note
          a myriad of different techniques and materials,   that a significantly higher discharge rate was
          which have been previously described but          seen  in the CWU  group,  as expected,  given
          were not subjected to a comparative analysis      the main advantage of a self-cleaning ear. We
          given the low number of cases  we  had for        also point out the seemingly large proportion
          each different type.                              of  patients  who  had  a  loss  of  follow-up.  This
          When comparing hearing outcomes from              occurrence  may  have  a  significant  negative
          CWU and CWD approaches we also found              impact on the long-term prognosis for these
          contrasting reports  in literature.  While  most   patients. Although not completely understood,
          studies  fail  to  find  any  significant  difference   loss of follow-up in our cohort can be in part
          between the two approaches.        15-17  some    explained by the constraints of medical care
          reported  better  hearing results with  CWU       during  the COVID-19 pandemic  and the
          procedures   4,18   while  the  opposite  has  also   significant  proportion  of  patients  who  have
          been described  . Our results demonstrated a      changed their residence, including emigrants,
                          19
          minimal worsening of hearing in both groups       commonly reported in our population.
          after surgery and support the notion that the
          preservation or not of the posterior canal wall
          has no significant influence on hearing results,



      170  Revista Portuguesa de Otorrinolaringologia - Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71