Page 35 - Portuguese Journal - SPORL - Vol 61. Nº2

Data Confidentiality Smith TL. et al. A brief version of the questionnaire of
The authors declare having followed the olfactory disorders in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019 Oct;9(10):1144-1150. doi:
protocols in use at their working center 10.1002/alr.22392.
regarding patients’ data publication. 9.Mattos JL, Bodner TE, Mace JC, Schlosser RJ, Beswick
DM, Ramakrishnan VR. et al. Psychometric properties of
Protection of humans and animals the brief version of the questionnaire of olfactory disorders
in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy
The authors declare that the procedures Rhinol. 2021 Oct;11(10):1436-1442. doi: 10.1002/alr.22800.
were followed according to the regulations 10.Hopkins C. Two years of COVID-19 – smell is still stealing
established by the Clinical Research and Ethics the spotlight on the rhinology stage. Rhinology. 2022 Apr
1;60(2):81. doi: 10.4193/Rhin22.902.
Committee and to the 2013 Helsinki Declaration 11.Cain WS, Gent JF, Goodspeed RB, Leonard G. Evaluation
of the World Medical Association. of olfactory dysfunction in the Connecticut Chemosensory
Clinical Research Center. Laryngoscope. 1988 Jan;98(1):83-
Funding Sources 8. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198801000-00017.
12.Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf SR, Pauli E, Kobal G.
This work did not receive any contribution, “Sniffin’sticks”: olfactory performance assessed by
funding or scholarship. the combined testing of odor identification, odor
discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses.
Availability of scientific data 1997 Feb;22(1):39-52. doi: 10.1093/chemse/22.1.39.
13.Ribeiro JC, Simões J, Silva F, Silva ED, Hummel C,
There are no datasets available, publicly related Hummel T. et al. Cultural adaptation of the Portuguese
to this work. version of the “Sniffin’ Sticks” smell test: reliability, validity,
and normative data. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 10;11(2):e0148937.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148937.
Acknowledgments 14.Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural
We would like to thank Dr. Zachary M. Soler for adaptation of health-related quality of life measures:
providing us with the original bvQOD-NS and literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol.
allowing us to translate it. 1993 Dec;46(12):1417-32. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-n.
15.Zou L, Haehner A, Menzel S, Gunder N, Hummel
T. Reliability and validity of a brief version of the
Bibliographic references Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (brief QOD) in
1.Stevenson RJ. An initial evaluation of the functions of patients with olfactory dysfunction. Rhinology. 2022 Feb
human olfaction. Chem Senses. 2010 Jan;35(1):3-20. doi: 1;60(1):56-62. doi: 10.4193/Rhin21.059.
10.1093/chemse/bjp083. 16.Chiesa-Estomba CM, Lechien JR, Calvo-Henríquez
2.Croy I, Nordin S, Hummel T. Olfactory disorders and C, Mayo M, Maldonado B, Maza J. et al. Translation and
quality of life - an updated review. Chem Senses. 2014 validation of the short version of the Questionnaire of
Mar;39(3):185-94. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjt072 Olfactory Disorders–Negative Statements to Spanish.
3.Schäfer L, Schriever VA, Croy I. Human olfactory Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 Jan-Feb;42(1):102775. doi: 10.1016/j.
dysfunction: causes and consequences. Cell Tissue Res. amjoto.2020.102775.
2021 Jan;383(1):569-579. doi: 10.1007/s00441-020-03381-9. 17.Leclercq C, Chiesa-Estomba CM, Horoi M, Le Bon
4.Hummel T, Whitcroft KL, Andrews P, Altundag A, SD, Hans S, Distinguin L. et al. Validity and reliability
Cinghi C, Costanzo RM. et al. Position paper on olfactory of the French short version of the Questionnaire of
dysfunction. Rhinol Suppl. 2017 Mar;54(26):1-30. doi: Olfactory Disorders-Negative Statements (sQOD-NS).
10.4193/Rhino16.248. Ear Nose Throat J. 2021 Aug 31;1455613211032004. doi:
5.Boscolo-Rizzo P, Hummel T, Hopkins C, Dibattista M, 10.1177/01455613211032004.
Menini A, Spinato G. et al. High prevalence of long-term 18.The World Factbook 2021 [Internet]. Washington DC:
olfactory, gustatory, and chemesthesis dysfunction Central Intelligence Agency; 2021 [accessed 20 October
in post-COVID-19 patients: a matched case-control 2022]. Available from: https://www.cia.gov/the-world-
study with one-year follow-up using a comprehensive factbook/about/archives/2021/.
psychophysical evaluation. Rhinology. 2021 Dec 1;59(6):517- 19.de Vilhena D, Duarte D, Lopes G. Sino-Nasal Outcome
527. doi: 10.4193/Rhin21.249. Test-22: translation, cultural adaptation and validation in
6.Frasnelli J, Hummel T. Olfactory dysfunction and daily Portugal. Clin Otolaryngol. 2016 Feb;41:21-24. doi: 10.1111/
life. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 Mar;262(3):231-5. doi: coa.12465.
10.1007/s00405-004-0796-y. 20.Cerejeira R, Veloso-Teles R, Lousan N, Pinto Moura C.
7.Simopoulos E, Katotomichelakis M, Gouveris H, Tripsianis The Portuguese version of the RhinoQOL Questionnaire:
G, Livaditis M, Danielides V. Olfaction-associated quality of validation and clinical application. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol.
life in chronic rhinosinusitis: Adaptation and validation of 2015 Nov-Dez;81(6):630-635. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.08.015.
an olfaction-specific questionnaire. Laryngoscope. 2012 21.Moraes JMM, Moraes CHC, Souza AAL, Alvarenga MDS.
Jul;122(7):1450-4. doi: 10.1002/lary.23349. Food choice motives among two disparate socioeconomic
8.Mattos JL, Edwards C, Schlosser RJ, Hyer M, Mace JC, groups in Brazil. Appetite. 2020 Dec 1;155:104790. doi:

Volume 61 . Nº2 . June 2023 177