Page 33 - Portuguese Journal - SPORL - Vol 61. Nº2
P. 33

Table 4
          Average rate of response of the Portuguese version of the bvQOD-NS

          Question                        Average            Standard Deviation          Min./Max.
          bvQOD-NS = 1                      1.90                    1.125                   0/3
          bvQOD-NS = 2                      1.70                    1.291                   0/3
          bvQOD-NS = 3                      0.97                    1.066                   0/3
          bvQOD-NS = 4                      2.40                    1.163                   0/3

          bvQOD-NS = 5                      2.00                    1.232                   0/3
          bvQOD-NS = 6                      1.13                    1.167                   0/3
          bvQOD-NS = 7                      0.80                    1.157                   0/3

          Table 5
          Answers reflecting negative impact in QoL in each item of the Portuguese version of the bvQOD-NS

          “Agree” and “partly agree” answers:
          1. Social isolation due to OD: 14/30 (46.7%)
          2. Negative impact on daily life activities: 14/30 (46.7%)
          3. Changes of character: 22/30 (73.3%)
          4. Less visits to restaurants: 6/30 (20%)
          5. Loss of appetite: 10/30 (33.3%)
          6. Difficulty to stay relaxed: 20/30 (66.7%)

          7. Worried about not recovering: 23/30 (76.7%)

          Questions three and seven brought up more         in the world, the authors considered this
          concern from the patients, whereas question       questionnaire  as  the  most  adequate  to  be
          four  showed  the  least impact  in  their  QoL.   used in clinical practice and research. 18
          (Table 4 and 5).                                  Regarding the translation process, the authors
          Comparison of post-COVID19 patients with          tried to follow the guidelines of cross-cultural
          other  causes  of  OD  revealed  a  statistically   adaptation of QoL measures by Guillemin et
          significant  difference  (p<0.05)  between  the   al,  in order to come up with an equivalent
                                                              14
          mean scores of the bvQOD-NS of both groups        translation of the original version to our country.
          (8.1 vs 12.3).                                    However, there were some recommendations
                                                            we chose not to implement: i) The authors did
          Discussion                                        not feel it was necessary for the translation
          The greatest advantage of the bvQOD-NS in         to be made by someone other than medical
          comparison with other olfactory specific QoL      doctors,  as  all  the  translators  were  fluent  in
          questionnaires is that is less time consuming,    English and the back-translator was an English
          and thus it is likely to elicit better response   native speaker. The same process was made
          rates and data quality.  While reviewing the      by Chiesa-Estomba et al. in the translation of
                                 15
          literature,  we  could  find  that  the  bvQOD-NS   the bvQOD-NS to Spanish; ii) Similar to other
                                                                                       16
          was already translated to Spanish and French,     QoL questionnaires that were translated and
          highlighting its usefulness in clinical practice   validated to Portuguese, translation process
          around Europe. 16,17  With an increasing interest   was done exclusively by medical doctors as
          in the study of OD and the lack of validated      we felt capable  of doing it ourselves - and
          questionnaires for the Portuguese language,       neither the pre-testing volunteers, nor the
          the  seventh  most-spoken  first  language        participants in the study reported any trouble



                                                                                      Volume 61 . Nº2 . June 2023 175
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38