Page 45 - Revista SPORL - Vol 59. Nº2
P. 45

Impact in 5-year OS of the discrepancies between   micrometastasis.  Nevertheless,  the  gold  standard  for
          cTNM and pTNM                                     diagnosis  micrometastasis  and  ENE  is  still  histological
          Using  the  Kaplan-Meier  method  to  create  survival   analysis.
          curves, and Log Rank to compare them, the estimated   Regarding  5-year  OS,  we  did  not  find  any  difference
          5-year  OS  was  not  significantly  different  for  patients   in  survival  curves  between  patients  who  had  been
          who had been upstaged in cT and cN (Log Rank = 0,254,   upstaged.  This  information  is  contradictory  in  the
          p = 0,614, and Log-Rank = 0,26, p = 0,871, respectively).  literature. Celakovsky et al (2017) found that discordance
                                                            between cTNM and pTNM was a prognostic factor, and
          DISCUSSION                                        should indicate the need for post-operative treatment
          Given the importance of cTNM in the clinical decision,   (if not indicated by pTNM itself). 2
          this process must be as meticulous as possible. It has   Our  study  has  some  limitations  that  can  directly
          a  direct  impact  on  treatment  planning  and  prognosis   impact results: because it is based on a retrospective
          establishment.                                    analysis, it took into account physical exams performed
          Our rate of discrepancy in cT (44.7%) was higher than   by  different  Surgeons,  imaging  studies  reported  by
          described in the literature. 3,4,8  Despite imaging studies   different  Radiologists,  and  histopathological  analysis      ARTIGO ORIGINAL ORIGINAL ARTICLE
          contributing  to  larynx  tumors  staging  process  after   by  different  Pathologists;  moreover,  it  has  a  limited
          clinical examination, there are some relatively common   number of patients.
          discordance motives, such as cartilage invasion, which,
          in  our  population,  was  the  most  common  factor  for   CONCLUSION
          discordance, leading both to upstaging and downstaging   Despite  advances  in  clinical  evaluation  and  imaging
          tumors.  As  stated  before,  despite  some  controversy   studies,  discrepancies  between  cTNM  and  pTNM  are
          in  their  sensitivity,  MRI  has  shown  greater  potential   still  frequent,  and,  in  our  population,  they  reached
          than CT in detecting cartilage invasion, above all in low   44.7% in cT and 29.8% in cN. The most frequent reason
          stages of larynx cancer.  Nevertheless, their specificity is   for this difference was the invasion of the outer cortex of
                            9
          compromised by some potential artifacts related to the   the thyroid cartilage not diagnosed in the preoperative
          inflammatory tumor-related changes in cartilage, which   evaluation.  Despite  that,  according  to  our  research,
          can  be  easily  mistaken  with  invasion.  More  recent   there  is  no  difference  in  5-year  OS  between  patients
          technology, such as dual-energy CT, is being investigated   with  and  without  discrepancies  in  TNM  staging,  the
          to  surpass  mostly  the  specificity  problems  of  CT  and   impact of the staging itself is well known, so improving
          MRI, to improve staging and prognosis establishment. 9  diagnostic  accuracy  should  be  a  priority  among  Head
          Regarding cT discrepancies, we verified an association   and Neck cancer dedicated surgeons and oncologists.
          between discrepancies in cT and glottic tumors, which   Conflito de Interesses
          is  compatible  with  the  literature.   Literature  relates   Os autores declaram que não têm qualquer conflito de
                                       2
          the  frequent  discrepancies  in  glottic  tumors  staging   interesse relativo a este artigo.
          predominantly  with  the  ones  involving  the  anterior
          commissure; nevertheless, authors report a higher rate   Confidencialidade dos dados
          of upstaging (as high as 50% of the cases) in this tumors,   Os autores declaram que seguiram os protocolos do seu
          which is the opposite of our results, in which we found a   trabalho na publicação dos dados de pacientes.
          high rate of downstaging. 10
          Another factor that might influence the rate of upstaging   Proteção de pessoas e animais
          is the delay in the treatment after the first diagnosis. We   Os  autores  declaram  que  os  procedimentos  seguidos
          found a statistically significant difference between the   estão  de  acordo  com  os  regulamentos  estabelecidos
          median  time  between  diagnosis  and  surgery.  Despite   pelos diretores da Comissão para Investigação Clínica e
          our median time to treatment (27 days) being similar to   Ética e de acordo com a Declaração de Helsínquia da
          the one presented by other authors, they did not find   Associação Médica Mundial.
          any  significant  difference  between  patients  who  had
          discrepancies between cTNM and pTNM. 4            Política  de  privacidade,  consentimento  informado  e
          On  the  other  hand,  the  discrepancy  in  cN  (29.8%)   Autorização do Comité de Ética
          was similar to other oncology groups.  Most authors   Os  autores  declaram  que  têm  o  consentimento  por
                                          2,4
          relate  the  discrepancies  in  the  neck  evaluation  with   escrito  para  o  uso  de  fotografias  dos  pacientes  neste
          micrometastasis and extranodular extension (ENE). Neck   artigo.
          palpation  alone  may  fail  to  identify  micrometastasis
          besides  lacking  the  capability  of  adequate  dimension   Financiamento
          measurement.   CT  scan  is,  undoubtfully,  very   Este  trabalho  não  recebeu  qualquer  contribuição,
                      4,6
          important  in  these  patients’  evaluation  and  may   financiamento ou bolsa de estudos.
          improve diagnostic accuracy, despite low sensitivity to



                                                                                       VOL 59 . Nº2 . JUNHO 2021 123
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50