Page 31 - Revista SPORL - Vol 59. Nº2
P. 31
Política de privacidade, consentimento informado e Academy of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Inc.
Autorização do Comité de Ética Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995 Sep;113(3):186-7. doi: 10.1016/
S0194-5998(95)70103-6.
Os autores declaram que têm o consentimento por 19.MacDonald RR 3rd, Lusk RP, Muntz HR. Fasciaform myringoplasty in
escrito para o uso de fotografias dos pacientes neste children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994 Feb;120(2):138-43.
artigo. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1994.01880260010003.
20.Koch WM, Friedman EM, McGill TJ, Healy GB. Tympanoplasty
in children: the Boston Children's Hospital experience. Arch
Financiamento Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990 Jan;116(1):35-40. doi: 10.1001/
Este trabalho não recebeu qualquer contribuição, archotol.1990.01870010039013.
21.Carr MM, Poje CP, Nagy ML, Pizzuto MP. et al. Success rates in
financiamento ou bolsa de estudos. paediatric tympanoplasty. J Otolaryngol. 2001 Aug;30(4):199-202. doi:
10.2310/7070.2001.19703.
Disponibilidade dos Dados científicos 22.Shih L, Tar T, Crabtree JA. Myringoplasty in children. Otolaryngol Head
Neck Surg. 1991 Jul;105(1):74-7. doi: 10.1177/019459989110500110.
Não existem conjuntos de dados disponíveis 23.Raine C, Singh S. Tympanoplasty in children: a review of 113
publicamente relacionados com este trabalho. cases. J Laryngol Otol. 1983 Mar;97(3):217-21. doi: 10.1017/
s0022215100094032.
Referências bibliográficas 24.Boronat-Echeverría NE, Reyes-García E, Sevilla-Delgado Y, Aguirre- ARTIGO ORIGINAL ORIGINAL ARTICLE
1.Wullstein H. Theory and practice of tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope. Mariscal H. et al. Prognostic factors of sucessful tympanoplasty in
1956 Aug;66(8):1076-93. doi: 10.1288/00005537-195608000-00008. pediatric patients: a cohort study. BMC Pediatr. 2012 Jun 12;12:67. doi:
Laryngoscope. 1956; 66(8):1076–93. 10.1186/1471-2431-12-67.
2.Lau T, Tos M. Tympanoplasty in children. An analysis of late results. 25.Melo AS, Oliveira J, Ferreira R, Casalta J, Cortesão R, Quadros
Am J Otol. 1986 Jan;7(1):55-9. J. et al. Timpanoplastia tipo I em idade Pediátrica - Casuística do
3.Kessler A, Potsic WP, Marsh RR. Type 1 tympanoplasty in children. Serviço e análise de fatores de sucesso. Revista portuguesa de
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994 May;120(5):487-90. doi: Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço. [Internet] 2016
10.1001/archotol.1994.01880290005001. Set; 181. Available from: https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.567.
4.Tan HE, Santa Maria PL, Eikelboom RH, Anandacoomaraswamy 26.Boonacker CW, Rovers MM, Browning GG, Hoes AW. et al.
KS. et al. Type I Tympanoplasty Meta-Analysis: A Single Variable Adenoidectomy with or without grommets for children with otitis
Analysis Otol Neurotol. 2016 Aug;37(7):838-46. doi: 10.1097/ media: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Health Technol
MAO.0000000000001099. Assess. 2014 Jan;18(5):1-118. doi: 10.3310/hta18050.
5.Baklaci D, Guler I, Kuzucu I, Kum RO. et al. Type 1 tympanoplasty
in pediatric patients: a review of 102 cases BMC Pediatr. 2018 Nov
6;18(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1326-1.
6.Schuknecht HF. Pathology of the Ear. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger;
1993. p. 204–206.
7.Vrabec JT, Deskin RW, Grady JJ. Meta-analysis of pediatric
tympanoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999
May;125(5):530-4. doi: 10.1001/archotol.125.5.530.
8.Sckolnick JS, Mantle B, Li J, Chi DH. Pediatric myringoplasty: factores
that affect sucess - a retrospective study. Laryngoscope. 2008
Apr;118(4):723-9. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31815f8e2f.
9.Umapathy N, Dekker PJ. Myringoplasty: is it worth performing in
children? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Oct;129(10):1053-
5. doi: 10.1001/archotol.129.10.1053.
10.Hardman J, Muzaffar J, Nankivell P, Coulson C. Tympanoplasty
for Chronic Tympanic Membrane Perforation in Children: Systematic
Review and Meta-analysis Otol Neurotol. 2015 Jun;36(5):796-804.
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000767.
11.Collins WO, Telischi FF, Balkany TJ, Buchman CA. Pediatric
tympanoplasty effect of contralateral ear status outcomes. Arch
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Jun;129(6):646-51. doi: 10.1001/
archotol.129.6.646.
12.Hay A, Blanshard J. The anterior interlay myringoplasty: outcome
and hearing results in anterior and subtotal tympanic membrane
perforations. Otol Neurotol. 2014 Oct;35(9):1569-76. doi: 10.1097/
MAO.0000000000000503.
13.Andersen SA, Aabenhus K, Glad H, Sørensen MS. Graft take
rates after tympanoplasty: results from a prospective ear surgery
database. Otol Neurotol. 2014 Dec;35(10):e292-7. doi: 10.1097/
MAO.0000000000000537.
14.Raine CH, Singh SD. Tympanoplasty in children. A review of
114 cases. J Laryngol Otol. 1983 Mar;97(3):217-21. doi: 10.1017/
s0022215100094032.
15.Bluestone CD, Cantekin EI, Douglas GS. Eustachian tube function
related to the results of tympanoplasty in children. Laryngoscope.
1979 Mar;89(3):450-8. doi: 10.1288/00005537-197903000-00013.
16.Manning SC, Cantekin EI, Kenna MA, Bluestone CD. Prognostic
value of eustachian tube function in pediatric tympanoplasty.
Laryngoscope. 1987 Sep;97(9):1012-6. doi: 10.1288/00005537-
198709000-00002.
17.Gersdorff M, Garin P, Decat M, Juantegui M. Myringoplasty: long
term results in adults and children Am J Otol. 1995 Jul;16(4):532-5.
18.Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the
evaluation of results of treatment of conductive hearing loss. American
VOL 59 . Nº2 . JUNHO 2021 109