Page 77 - Revista Portuguesa - SPORL - Vol 63. Nº2

Financiamento Dreschler WA, Grolman W. Primary stapes surgery in
Este trabalho não recebeu qualquer contribuição, patients with otosclerosis prediction of postoperative
outcome. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011
financiamento ou bolsa de estudos. Aug;137(8):780-4. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2011.100.
15. Strömbäck K, Lundman L, Bjorsne A, Grendin J,
Disponibilidade dos Dados científicos Stjernquist-Desatnik A, Dahlin-Redfors Y. Stapes surgery
Não existem conjuntos de dados disponíveis in Sweden: evaluation of a national-based register. Eur
Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jun;274(6):2421-2427. doi:
publicamente relacionados com este trabalho. 10.1007/s00405-017-4510-2.
16. Wegner I, Verhagen JJ, Stegeman I, Vincent R,
Referências bibliográficas Grolman W. A systematic review of the effect of piston
1. Dhooge I, Desmedt S, Maly T, Loose D, Van Hoecke H. diameter in stapes surgery for otosclerosis on hearing
Long-term hearing results of stapedotomy: analysis of results. Laryngoscope. 2016 Jan;126(1):182-90. doi: 10.1002/
factors affecting outcome. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. lary.25408
2018 May;275(5):1111-1119. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-4899-2. 17. Committee on hearing and equilibrium guidelines
2. Ealy M, Smith RJH. Otosclerosis. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. for the evaluation of results of treatment of conductive
2011:70:122-129. doi: 10.1159/000322488. hearing loss. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery.
3. Uppal S, Bajaj Y, Rustom I, Coatesworth AP. Otosclerosis 1995 Sep;113(3):186–7. DOI: 10.1016/S0194-5998(95)70103-6
1: the aetiopathogenesis of otosclerosis. Int J Clin Pract. 18. Wegner I, van Waes AM, Bittermann AJ, Buitinck
2009 Oct;63(10):1526-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02045.x SH, Dekker CF, Kurk SA. et al. A Systematic review
4. Cureoglu S, Schachern PA, Ferlito A, Rinaldo A, of the diagnostic value of CT imaging in diagnosing
Tsuprun V, Paparella MM. Otosclerosis: etiopathogenesis otosclerosis. Otol Neurotol. 2016 Jan;37(1):9-15. doi: 10.1097/
and histopathology. Am J Otolaryngol. 2006 Sep- MAO.0000000000000924.
Oct;27(5):334-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2005.11.001. 19. Kisilevsky VE, Dutt SN, Bailie N, Halik JJ. Hearing results
5. Schrauwen I, Van Camp G. The etiology of otosclerosis: of 1145 stapedotomies evaluated with Amsterdam hearing
a combination of genes and environment. Laryngoscope. evaluation plots. J Laryngol Otol. 2009 Jul;123(7):730-6. doi:
2010 Jun;120(6):1195-202. doi: 10.1002/lary.20934. 10.1017/S0022215109004745.
6. Czerwińska G, Ścierski W, Namysłowski G, Lisowska G, 20. Cavaliere M, Ricciardiello F, Mesolella M, Iengo M.
Misiołek M. The surgical treatment results of otosclerosis Stapedotomy: functional results with different diameter
at the Department of Otolaryngology Silesian Medical prostheses. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec.
University in Zabrze in years 2000–2010 Otolaryngol Pol. 2012;74(2):93-6. doi: 10.1159/000335927.
2017 Apr 30;71(2):16-21. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0009.8410. 21. Shabana, Ghonim, Pedersen. Stapedotomy: does
7. Khorsandi A. MT, Jalali MM, Shoshi D. V. Predictive prosthesis diameter affect outcome? Clin Otolaryngol
factors in 995 stapes surgeries for primary otosclerosis. Allied Sci. 1999 Apr;24(2):91-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-
Laryngoscope. 2018 Oct;128(10):2403-2407. doi: 10.1002/ 2273.1999.00207.x.
lary.27160. 22. Bernardeschi D, De Seta D, Canu G, Russo FY, Ferrary E,
8. Laske RD, Röösli C, Chatzimichalis MV, Sim JH, Huber Lahlou G. et al. Does the diameter of the stapes prosthesis
AM. The influence of prosthesis diameter in stapes really matter? A prospective clinical study. Laryngoscope.
surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the 2018 Aug;128(8):1922-1926. doi: 10.1002/lary.27021.
literature. Otol Neurotol. 2011 Jun;32(4):520-8. doi: 10.1097/ 23. Sennaroglu L, Ünal ÖF, Sennaroglu G, Gürsel B, Belgin
MAO.0b013e318216795b. E. Effect of teflon piston diameter on hearing result
9. Marchese MR, Conti G, Cianfrone F, Scorpecci A, Fetoni after stapedotomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001
AR, Paludetti G. Predictive role of audiological and clinical Mar;124(3):279-81. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2001.112431.
features for functional results after stapedotomy. Audiol 24. Grolman W, Tange RA, Bruijn AJ de, Hart AA,
Neurootol. 2009;14(5):279-85. doi: 10.1159/000212105. Schouwenburg PF. A retrospective study of the hearing
10. Fisch U. Stapedotomy versus stapedectomy. 1982. results obtained after stapedotomy by the implantation
Otol Neurotol. 2009 Dec;30(8):1160-5. doi: 10.1097/ of two Teflon pistons with a different diameter. Eur Arch
MAO.0b013e3181c1792d. Otorhinolaryngol. 1997;254(9-10):422-4. doi: 10.1007/
11. Bailey HAT, Pappas JJ, Graham SS. Small fenestra BF02439972.
stapedectomy. A preliminary report. Laryngoscope. 1981 25. Sim JH, Chatzimichalis M, Röösli C, Laske RD, Huber
Aug;91(8):1308-21. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198108000-00013. AM. Objective assessment of stapedotomy surgery from
12. Vincent R, Sperling NM, Oates J, Jindal M. round window motion measurement. Ear Hear. 2012 Sep-
Surgical findings and long-term hearing results in Oct;33(5):e24-31. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318258c7a6.
3,050 stapedotomies for primary otosclerosis. Otol 26. Dhooge I, Desmedt S, Maly T, Loose D, Van Hoecke
Neurotol. 2006 Dec;27(8 Suppl 2):S25-47. doi: 10.1097/01. H. Long-term hearing results of stapedotomy: analysis
mao.0000235311.80066.df. of factors affecting outcome. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol.
13. Wegner I, Eldaebes MMAS, Landry TG, Grolman W, 2018 May;275(5):1111-1119. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-4899-2.
Bance ML. The effect of piston diameter in stapedotomy
for otosclerosis: a temporal bone model. Otol Neurotol. 2016
Dec;37(10):1497-1502. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001212.
14. Bittermann AJN, Rovers MM, Tange RA, Vincent R,

Volume 63 . Nº2 . Junho 2025 181