Page 45 - Portuguese Journal - SPORL - Vol 61. Nº1
P. 45

score obtained was 1.863 ±1.429 (0-5). It was     reinforced by the short time of fulfillment of
          found  a  significant  difference  between  both   all items, which demonstrates the feasibility
          groups (P-value<0.001) (Table 6).                 of this version. Reproducibility is given by the
                                                            degree of stability of the information when
          Factorial analysis: The anti-image correlation    the measurement is repeated under similar
          matrix reveals a strong correlation for each      conditions. Our reliability coefficient was very
          item (r>0.8) that validated their integration     high indicating a homogenous reproducible
          in  analysis.  The  KMO statistic  equal  to  0,915   Portuguese version.  The strength of any
                                                                                 9
          and  significative  Bartlett's  test  of  sphericity   research tool is directly linked to internal
          (p-value < 0,001) validate the factorial solution.   consistency. It measures whether several
          All items have communalities higher than 0.4      items that propose to give the identical
          (only item 15 has commonalities below 0.3         general construct  produce similar  scores.  In
          reveal little in common with the other items      our study item to item relations were strong
          and the extracted factors). Four factors were     as Cronbach’s parametric statistic was 0.946,
          extracted from the data: healthcare utilization   making our European-Portuguese version
          and infections (items 9, 8, 3, 2, 6, 4 and 5; factor   a reliable one.  Validity refers to the degree
                                                                           9
          loadings: 0.87, 0.85, 0.84, 0.77, 0.76, 0.71 and   to which a study or questionnaire accurately
          0.67, respectively); airway and breathing (items   reflects the precise concept that the researcher
          7,1,11 and 13; factor loadings: 0.85, 0.77, 0.73,   is attempting to give. Item to item correlations,
          and 0.54, respectively); eating and swallowing    correlations within each item, subscales, and
          (items 12 and 14; factor loadings: 0.92 and 0.47,   total score, had a positive relation with the initial
          respectively). The three factors explain a total   TAHSI - confirming the validity of our research
          variance  of 68%: the healthcare utilization      tool. Discriminatory validity is that the degree
          and infections factor explain 34,47%; airway      to which a test or measure diverges from
          and breathing 21,78%; eating and swallowing       another measure whose underlying construct
          11,80%. Cost of care (item 10 with factor loading   is conceptually unrelated thereto the power
          equal to 0.62 saturates in healthcare utilization   of the questionnaire to differentiate between
          and infections factor) and behavior (item 15      interventional and  control groups.  The high
          with factor loading equal to 0.29 saturates       statistically   significant   results   regarding
          in airway and breathing factor) did not meet      comparing the whole score and subscale
          criteria to load onto any of the three principal   scores between both  groups  indicated  that
          factors and were included as separate             our research tool is valid. Responsiveness
          subscales. (Table 7)                              is the ability of the questionnaire to detect
                                                            changes of status over time.  Our tool proved
                                                                                         9
          Discussion                                        to  be  responsive,  this  can  be  confirmed  by
          Goals proposed: The main goal of this study       comparing the overall score and subscale
          was to adapt and validate the European-           scores before and after the procedure, which
          Portuguese version of the TAHSI with an           showed respectively higher and lower scores.
          analysis of the advantages of the psychological   Also, these results were statistically significant.
          dimension. This can only be archived if the tool   The psychometric merits of our version
          matches the original version.                     coincide with the initial English study tool and
                                                            Arabic version with the identical 6 domains. 2,10
          Translation and evaluation of the statistical     They also coincide with other versions just
          power of EP-TAHSI: The adequate translation       like the Spanish version which used only 5
          was established by following the principles       domains.
                                                                     11
          of forward and backward translation - this
          allowed the assembly of a version of an           Limitations: The varied limitations which can
          easy and reliable answer.  This can be also       be stated about our study can be the actual
                                    8


                                                                                     Volume 61 . Nº1 . March 2023 45
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50