Page 81 - Portuguese Journal - SPORL - Vol 61. Nº1
P. 81

drugsatfda_docs/label/2021/103976s5239lbl.pdf
          27. FDA. NUCALA® (Mepolizumab) Highlights of
          Prescribing Information [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2022 mar
          31]. p. 41. Disponível em: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/
          drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/761122s008,125526s019lbl.pdf
          28. EMA. Dupixent: EPAR - Product Information [Internet].
          Vol. 16, Netherlands Yearbook of International Law. 1985
          [cited 2022 mar 31. p. 171. Disponível em: https://www.ema.
          europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/dupixent-
          epar-product-information_en.pdf
          29. EMA. Xolair : EPAR - Product Information [Internet].
          Vol. 16, Netherlands Yearbook of International Law. 1985
          [cited 2022 mar 31]. p. 165. Disponível em: https://www.
          ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/
          xolair-epar-product-information_en.pdf
          30. EMA. Nucala : EPAR - Product Information [Internet].
          Vol. 16, Netherlands Yearbook of International Law. 1985
          [cited 2022 mar 31]. p. 62. Disponível em: https://www.ema.
          europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/nucala-
          epar-product-information_en.pdf
          31. Weinstein MC, Torrance G, McGuire A. QALYs: The basics.
          Value  Health.  2009  Mar;12  Suppl  1:S5-9.  doi:  10.1111/j.1524-
          4733.2009.00515.x.
          32. Rudmik L, Soler ZM, Mace JC, Schlosser RJ, Smith
          TL. Economic evaluation of endoscopic sinus surgery
          versus continued medical therapy for refractory chronic
          rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope. 2015 Jan;125(1):25-32. doi:
          10.1002/lary.24916.
          33. Scangas GA, Wu AW, Ting JY, Metson R, Walgama E,
          Shrime MG. et al. Cost utility analysis of endoscopic sinus
          surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal
          polyposis.  Laryngoscope.  2021  Jan;131(1):E26-E33.  doi:
          10.1002/lary.28648.
          34. Scangas GA, Wu AW, Ting JY, Metson R, Walgama E,
          Shrime MG. et al. Cost Utility analysis of dupilumab versus
          endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with
          nasal polyps. Laryngoscope. 2021 Jan;131(1):E26-E33. doi:
          10.1002/lary.28648.
          35. Fokkens  WJ, Lund V, Bachert C,  Mullol J,  Bjermer
          L, Bousquet J. et al. EUFOREA consensus on biologics
          for CRSwNP with or without asthma. Allergy. 2019
          Dec;74(12):2312-2319. doi: 10.1111/all.13875.
          36.Wu Q, Zhang Y, Kong W, Wang X, Yuan L,  Zheng R. et
          al. Which is the best biologic for nasal polyps: Dupilumab,
          Omalizumab, or Mepolizumab? A network meta-analysis.
          Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2022;183(3):279-288. doi:
          10.1159/000519228.





















                                                                                     Volume 61 . Nº1 . March 2023 81
   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86