Page 32 - Revista SPORL - Vol 45. Nº1
P. 32
ISABEL MARQUES ROSA, RUI RIBEIRO NUNES, MADEIRA DA SILVA
procedures in Valente, M. (1994).
Strategies for selecting and verifying hearing
American National Standards Institute. (1969). oid fitting. New York.
Specifications for audiometers, ANSl-S3-1969.
American National Standards Institute, Inc., Moore, B. C. ]. (1997). An introduction to
New York. the psychology of hearing. San Diego.
Fortune, T. Amplifiers and circuit algorithms Moore, B. C. J. (1999). Use of a loudness
of comtemporary hearing aids in Valente, model oÍ hearing aid fitting. IV. Fitting hea-
M. (1996). Hearing aids: standards, options, ring aids with multichannel compression so
ond limitations. New York. as to restore "normal" loudness for speech
at different levels. British Journal of Audiolo-
Fowler, E. P. (1937). The diagnosis of disea- gy, 2000, 34: 165-177.
ses of the neural mechanism of hearing by
the aid of sounds well above thereshold. Philips, D. P. (1987). Stimulus intensity and
Transl. Am. Otol. Soc. 53:78—84. loudness recruitment: Neural correlates. J.
Acoustic. Soc. Am. No. 1, July. 1-12.
Luscher, E., Zwislocki. (1949). A simple me-
thod for indirect monoaural determination oÍ Riesz, R. R. (1928). Differential intensity sen—
the recruitment phenomenon (diferenca limen sitivity of the ear for pure tones.
in intensity in different types of deafness). Physics Review. 31 :867—875.
Actc Otolaryngol. (Stockholm) 78 (Suppl):
156-168. Schubert, E. D. (1979). Psycologicol acous-
tics. U.S.A.
luscher, E. (1951). The difference limen of
intensity variations of pure tones and its diog- Stevens, S. S., Davis, H. (1938). Hearing-lt's
nostic significance. J. laryngol. Otol. 65: psychology ond physiology.
486—510. New York: Wiley.
McConless, G.A.. Overview ond rationale Venemo, T. (1998). Compression for clini-
of thereshold-bosed hearing aid selection cians. San Diego.
_ 30 __
