Page 79 - Portuguese Journal - SPORL - Vol 61. Nº2
P. 79

This is the only instrument that is equivalent to   Clinical  and  scientific  utility  of  the  PROM
          the versions adapted to other languages and       versions in EP
          the original  (Table 2). The VHI-9i demonstrated   The VHI is the only instrument that meets the
                     13
          seven of the 10 clinimetric properties in a target   recommended criteria (Table 4).
          population of more than 100 individuals, thus
          meeting  the  recommended  criterion  (≥  0.70);   Discussion
          however, there are no data on its reproducibility   The adaptations of the four PROMs and one
          (Table 3).                                        Proxy to EP are equivalent to their respective
          There is only one study on the validation of      originals.  Of  these,  the  VHI  is  recommended
          the VHI-10, which was conducted in a non-         for use in clinical and research settings
          representative sample of the target population,   because its 10 clinimetric properties have
          with regard to the size and condition (laryngeal   been analyzed and found to be robust. Our
          disease) . The questionnaire was administered     data confirm that the VHI is the gold standard
                  8
          by a telephone interview, a strategy that differs   instrument because it correlates strongly and
          from what is recommended and from what            significantly  with  the  abbreviated  versions
          was used in the original version. Nevertheless,   (VHI-9i  and  VHI-10)  and the SVHI,  as  has
          the EP version of the VHI-10 demonstrated five    been shown internationally . In addition,
                                                                                          2
          of  the  recommended  clinimetric  properties     it has the advantage of the possibility of
          (Table 3). The pVHI shows results for eight       using the subscale scores in an independent
          clinimetric properties, with all meeting the      manner (functional, physical, and emotional)
          recommended criteria except for concurrent        in addition to the total score, which the
          validity (r =0.412, lower than 0.70) (Table 3).   abbreviated versions (VH9i and VHI-10) do not
                   s
          The validation study on the SVHI, conducted       allow as they are unidimensional scales that
          in  75  singers  and/or  actors,  50  of  whom  had   provide only an overall result . However, it can
                                                                                        5,8
          dysphonia, and 324 professionals observed         be improved, for example, by determining: (i)
          in the ORL clinic of a hospital in Lisbon    11   the cutoff value for individuals with dysphonia,
          meets  five  of  the  10  clinimetric  properties   which could be a useful indicator for screening
          because structural validity and sensitivity to    cases for subsequent referral for a clinical
          change were not analyzed and the criterion        evaluation; (ii) the equivalence between its
          recommended  by  COSMIN  for  predictive          use in the paper and digital format, as there
          validity (≥ 0.70) was not met (Table 3).          are studies on its use in the latter format .
                                                                                                    16

          Table 4
          Clinical and scientific utility of the PROMs in EP

                                                                     VHI    VHI-9i  VHI-10   pVHI   SVHI

          1. Clinimetric properties
            Reliability (3)                                           3       2        2      3       2

            Validity (6)                                              6       4        3      5       3
            Sensitivity to change (1)                                  1       1       X      X      X

          2. Application (other authors - journals)                   √       X        X      X      X
          Classification

          Recommended                                                 √       X        X      X      X
          Recommended with caution                                            X        X      X      X

          Potentially recommended                                             √       √       √      √


                                                                                      Volume 61 . Nº2 . June 2023 221
   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84