Page 9 - Portuguese Journal - SPORL - Vol 61. Nº2
P. 9

Table 1
           Sociodemographic characteristics of the participants

          Sociodemographic characteristics                                                     n = 132
          Sex                                                                                  n (%)
           - Female                                                                           95 (72,0)
           - Male                                                                             37 (28,0)
                                                                                              Median
          Age (y)                                                                            (min-max)
                                                                                             25 (24-37)
          School where the medical course was completed                                        n (%)
           - School of Medicine – University of Minho                                          7 (5,3)
           - Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar - Universidade do Porto             15 (11,4)
           - Faculdade de Medicina - Universidade do Porto                                    22 (16,7)
           - Faculdade de Medicina - Universidade de Coimbra                                  29 (22,0)
           - Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde - Universidade da Beira Interior                   10 (7,6)
           - Faculdade de Medicina - Universidade de Lisboa                                   22 (16,7)
           - Nova Medical School/ Faculdade de Ciências Médicas - Universidade Nova de Lisboa  18 (13,6)
           - Faculdade de Medicina e Ciências Biomédicas - Universidade do Algarve             2 (1,5)
           - School abroad                                                                     7 (5,3)
          Year in which the medical course ended                                               n (%)
             2015 - 2018                                                                       3 (2,3)
             2019 - 2021                                                                      129 (97,7)
          ARS where the intern is doing the IFG                                                n (%)
           - North                                                                            51 (38,6)
           - Center                                                                           25 (18,9)
           - Lisbon and Vale do Tejo                                                          35 (26,5)
           - Alentejo                                                                          1 (0,8)
           - Algarve                                                                           10 (7,6)
           - Autonomous Region Madeira                                                         7 (5,3)
           - Autonomous Region of Azores                                                       3 (2,3)

          Abbreviations: ARS, Regional Health Authority; IFG, Internato de Formação Geral.

          Curricular” - UC) that included the training      (standard deviation [SD]=1.283). There was no
          in tracheostomy, 41.7% (10/24) participants       significant difference in the mean number of
          indicated otorhinolaryngology, 20.8% (5/24)       correct answers between the participants who
          answered “Don’t know/ No answer”, and the         received training in tracheostomy during the
          remaining  37.5%  (9/24)  mentioned  other        medical course and those who did not (Table
          UCs,   predominantly    intensive   medicine      2). In addition, there was no difference in the
          and anesthesiology (Figure 1). With regard        mean number of correct answers according
          to having had contact with patients with a        to the type  of training (theoretical alone vs.
          tracheostomy during IFG, 49.2% (65/132) of the    theoretical with some practical component).
          participants answered “Yes” and the remaining     There was no statistically significant difference
          answered “No”. In the majority of cases, contact   in the mean number of correct answers
          with patients with a tracheostomy occurred        (Table 2) of doctors who had contact with
          in the context of hospitalization (n=53; 81.5%),   tracheostomized patients during IFG and
          followed by the emergency department (n=9;        those of doctors who did not.
          13.8%) and outpatient clinic (n=3; 4.6%). The     Moreover, a comparison of the mean number
          distribution  of  the  answers  to  the  questions   of correct answers according to the school
          regarding the participants’ knowledge about       where the medical studies were completed did
          tracheostomy is shown in Figure 2.                not  show  a  statistically  significant  difference
          The mean number of correct answers was 4.60       (p=0.383).



                                                                                      Volume 61 . Nº2 . June 2023 151
   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14