Page 61 - Portuguese Journal - SPORL - Vol 61. Nº2

Human and animal protection P. et al. Does CT help in predicting preepiglottic space
The authors declare that the procedures invasion in laryngeal carcinoma? Auris Nasus Larynx. 2018
Jun;45(3):546-552. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2017.07.002
followed in the study were according to the 9. Reidenbach MM. The paraglottic space and transglottic
regulations established by the Ethics and cancer: Anatomical considerations. Clin Anat. 1996;9(4):244-
Clinical Research Committee and according to 51. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1996)9:4<244::AID-
the Helsinki declaration of the World Medical CA5>3.0.CO;2-E.
10. Ravanelli M, Paderno A, Del Bon F, Montalto N,
Association. Pessina C, Battocchio S, et al. Prediction of posterior
paraglottic space and cricoarytenoid unit involvement in
Data confidentiality endoscopically T3 glottic cancer with arytenoid fixation by
magnetic resonance with surface coils. Cancers (Basel).
The authors declare that they followed the 2019 Jan 10;11(1):67. doi: 10.3390/cancers11010067.
protocols in use at their working center 11. Banko B, Djukic V, Milovanovic J, Kovac J, Novakovic Z,
regarding the publication of the patients’ data. Maksimovic R. MRI in evaluation of neoplastic invasion
into preepiglottic and paraglottic space. Auris Nasus
Larynx. 2014 Oct;41(5):471-4. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2014.02.008A.
Conflict of Interest 12. Forastiere AA, Ismaila N, Lewin JS, Nathan CA, Adelstein
The authors declare no conflict of interest DJ, Eisbruch A. et al. Use of larynx-preservation strategies
regarding this article. in the treatment of laryngeal cancer: American society
of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline update.
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr 10;36(11):1143-1169. doi: 10.1200/
Funding JCO.2017.75.7385.
There were no external sources of funding for 13. Sherman EJ, Fisher SG, Kraus DH, Zelefsky MJ, Seshan
the present study. VE, Singh B. et al. TALK score: development and validation
of a prognostic model for predicting larynx preservation
outcome. Laryngoscope. 2012 May;122(5):1043-50. doi:
Bibliographic references 10.1002/lary.23220.
1. Contrera KJ, Hair BB, Prendes B, Reddy CA, Zimmer
DI, Burkey BB. et al. Clinical versus pathologic laryngeal
cancer staging and the impact of stage change on
outcomes. Laryngoscope 2021 Mar;131(3):559-565. doi:
10.1002/lary.28924.
2. Jaipuria B, Dosemane D, Kamath PM, Sreedharan SS,
Shenoy VS. Staging of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal
cancer: computed tomography versus histopathology.
Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jul;30(99):189-194.
3. Locatello LG, Pietragalla M, Taverna C, Bonasera L,
Massi D, Mannelli G. A critical reappraisal of primary
and recurrent advanced laryngeal cancer staging.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2019 Jan;128(1):36-43. doi:
10.1177/0003489418806915.
4. Eskander A, Blakaj DM, Dziegielewski PT. Decision
making in advanced larynx cancer: an evidenced based
review. Oral Oncol. 2018 Nov;86:195-9. doi: 10.1016/j.
oraloncology.2018.09.019.
5. Celakovsky P, Kalfert D, Smatanova K, Kordac P, Laco J,
Chrobok V. Discordance between clinical and pathological
TNM classification: influence on results of treatment and
prognosis in patients with laryngeal cancer. Neoplasma.
2017;64(2):305-310. doi: 10.4149/neo_2017_219.
6. Calvas OIJ, Ramos DM, Matos LL, Kulcsar MAV, Dedivitis
RA, Brandão LG. et al. Oncological results of surgical
treatment versus organ-function preservation in larynx
and hypopharynx cancer. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2017
Dec;63(12):1082-9. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.63.12.1082.
7. Koch WM, Ridge JA, Forastiere A, Manola J. Comparison
of clinical and pathological staging in head and neck
squamous cell carcinoma: results from intergroup study
ECOG 4393/RTOG 9614. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
2009 Sep;135(9):851-8. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2009.123.
8. Bozkurt G, Unsal O, Celebi I, Ayhan B, Guliyev U, Akova

Volume 61 . Nº2 . June 2023 203